Naya Pakistan

8 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

Pakistan as an idea has taken the turn in a new direction today. I have a strong feeling that the upcoming time is very hard but also very fruitful. Reach out to people that use to make this forum a daily hangout and bring this forum back to life. Many may not know that it is up again. This is the time to have conversations and ideas together. Pakistan Zindabad

  

Aziz, Amar and IbnAbdullah like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

Nawaz Sharif sentenced 11, Maryam 8 years in Avenfield reference

 

ISLAMABAD: Former prime minister Nawaz Sharif was sentenced to a total of 11 years in prison and slapped a £8 million fine (Rs1.3 billion) in the Avenfield properties reference on Friday while his daughter Maryam was sentenced to eight years with a £2 million fine (Rs335 million). 

The sentences will run concurrently, which means Nawaz will serve 10 years in prison, while Maryam seven. Additionally, Nawaz's son-in-law Capt (retd) Safdar has been given a one year sentence without any fine. 

Accountability Court-I Judge Mohammad Bashir announced the verdict today after several delays since morning. 

Nawaz has been sentenced to 10 years imprisonment under NAB ordinance Section 9(a)(v), which relates to owning assets disproportionate to known sources of income.

The Section 9(a)(v) of the NAB ordinance states: “A holder of a public office, or any other person, is said to commit or to have committed the offence of corruption and corrupt practices…. if he or any of his dependents or benamidar owns, possesses, or has [acquired] right or title in any [“assets or holds irrevocable power of attorney in respect of any assets] or pecuniary resources disproportionate to his known sources of income, which he cannot [reasonably] account for [or maintains a standard of living beyond that which is commensurate with his sources of income.]”

On the other hand, Maryam has been sentenced to seven-year to prison for abetment.

According to the 173-page long verdict, "Accused Maryam Nawaz aided, assisted, abetted, attempted and acted in conspiracy with her father accused Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif who was holder of Public Office."

Moreover, Maryam and Nawaz were given an additional year-long imprisonment for not cooperating during the investigation

Nawaz's sons Hassan and Hussain who have been absconding in the case were declared as "proclaimed offenders" and the court ordered non-bailable perpetual warrants of arrest against them. 

The court has also ruled that the Avenfield apartments of the Sharif family, in their possession since 1993, shall be seized by the federal government.  

"Avenfield Apartments Nos 16, 16-a, 17 and 17-a stand forfeited to Federal Government within the meaning of 10(a) of NAO, 1999," according to the written verdict. 

The Avenfield properties reference was one of three filed by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) last year in light of the Supreme Court's verdict against Nawaz in the Panama Papers case. The reference pertains to the ownership of the Sharif family's apartments at Avenfield House, London.

After the hearing, NAB Deputy Prosecutor General Sardar Muzaffar Abbasi said the accused have 10 days to file an appeal against the verdict. 

Accused acquitted under Section 9(a)(iv) of NAO 

Moreover, the court acquitted the accused under the Section 9(a)(iv) of NAO 1999 due to the failure of the prosecution to provide any "bright evidence" in this regard. 

"Prosecution have not bright evidence in respect of 9(a)(iv) NAO, 1999. So the accused are acquitted under that section of law," the verdict stated, adding "It was difficult to establish ownership of properties which was purchased through offshore companies formed in tax haven jurisdictions de to veils of secrecy."

The Section 9(a)(iv) states: "a holder of a public office, or any other person, is said to commit or to have committed the offence of corruption and corrupt practices......if he by corrupt, dishonest, or illegal means, obtains or seeks to obtain for himself, or for his spouse or dependents or any other person, any property, valuable thing, or pecuniary advantage."

Maryam, Safdar barred from elections 

Following the verdict, Maryam and Safdar stand barred from contesting the July general election from Lahore and Mansehra, respectively. 

According to the verdict, Maryam Nawaz will be disqualified for 10 years from holding public office after her seven-year jail terms ends.

The Election Commission of Pakistan stated that Maryam's name will be removed from the ballot papers of the NA-127 constituency after which new ballot papers will be printed. 

'Will return after wife regains consciousness' 

Nawaz Sharif has vowed to return to Pakistan after his wife regains consciousness.

"It is my wish to speak to her [Kulsoom]. I [go to the hospital] every day with the hope that she regains consciousness and I am able to meet here. She has been my life partner for 45 years. This partnership is no ordinary partnership,” said the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz supremo while addressing a press conference sitting alongside his daughter Maryam Nawaz, who has been sentenced to a total of eight years in jail. 

All eyes on accountability court

All eyes were set on the accountability court hearing the high-profile corruption cases against the former prime minister and his family. Strict security arrangements, including paramilitary personnel, were in place at the Federal Judicial Complex, where the court is located. The roads leading to the complex were also closed to traffic.

Moreover, the district administration had imposed Section 144 in the capital to discourage mass gatherings. 

As the hearing went under way today, Judge Bashir heard Sharifs' request, submitted on Thursday, requesting the trial court to postpone the verdict till he is back in the country next week.

After submitting Begum Kulsoom Nawaz's medical report, Maryam's counsel Amjad Pervez argued that the law stipulates the presence of the accused when the verdict is read out. After the prosecution opposed any delay at such a late stage of the trial, the judge reserved his verdict and adjourned the hearing for an hour.

Later, the court dismissed Sharifs' plea and set 12:30pm as the time for announcing the verdict. However, that deadline was later extended thrice — 2:30pm, 3pm and 3:30pm — before it was finally read out after 4pm. 

The judge had called lawyers of both sides inside his chambers and disallowed the media. He then stated that the media will be called in when the judgment is being read out. 

Earlier, the judge, present inside his chamber, had issued the delay notices through the court staff but the 3:30 pm deadline was informed of by the judge himself. He explained that they have to make an appropriate number of photocopies of the judgment for distribution to the relevant parties. 

Safdar vows to stand firm 

Speaking to voters prior to the verdict, Safdar said he does not fear any verdict against him, adding that he will be exonerated in the court of public opinion. 

On Tuesday, the court had reserved its verdict and ordered all accused to ensure their presence in court when the verdict is read out today.

Apart from Nawaz, Maryam and  Safdar, Nawaz's sons are also accused in the case. They were declared proclaimed offenders last year owing to their no-show and will face a separate trial whenever they join the proceedings. 

The accused have been charged as per the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, according to which they face maximum jail terms of 14 years and/or a fine, each.  

The trial 

201862_6900876_updates.jpg
 

After the Supreme Court disqualified Nawaz in the Panama Papers case on July 28, 2017, the NAB, in light of the verdict, filed three corruption references against the Sharif family in the accountability court.

The trial against the Sharif family commenced on September 14, 2017, under the supervision of Supreme Court Justice Ijazul Ahsan, who was appointed a monitoring judge in the Panama case verdict. 

201862_1789728_updates.jpgNawaz, Maryam entering the court premises earlier this year. Photo: File 
 

During the course of the trial, spread over 107 hearings, a total of 18 prosecution witnesses recorded their statements, including the Panama case joint investigation team (JIT) head, Federal Investigation Agency's Wajid Zia.

It was the Zia-led JIT's report which the Supreme Court used last year as a basis for Nawaz's disqualification and further investigation of the Sharif family's assets. 

After his statement was recorded, the defence counsels cross-examined Zia for around two weeks.

The prosecution also recorded statements of two witnesses through video-link from London — private solicitor Akhtar Raja and forensic expert Robert Radley — whose expertise was utilised by the JIT during its probe. 

201862_2242488_updates.jpgNawaz and Maryam outside the court premises this year. Photo: File 
 

Nawaz and the other accused were asked 127 questions during their cross-examination, while no witnesses appeared in their defence.

Nawaz and Maryam attended the majority of hearings, skipping a few as they visited London in between to spend time with Begum Kulsoom Nawaz. 

Safdar, however, attended nearly all the proceedings. 

The apex court had directed the trial court to conclude the cases in six months. However, the court has only concluded proceedings of the Avenfield reference despite two deadline extensions — the latest one being July 10.  

The other two corruption references — Al-Azizia Steel Mills and Hill Metal Establishment and offshore companies including Flagship Investment Limited — have yet to conclude. 

Edited by H Rehman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Good news! Now that Nawaz Sharif has been sentenced to imprisonment. Let's get started on putting another traitor in prison as well, Asif Ali Ghaddari.

IbnAbdullah and Amar like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Salam

 

2018 election results (almost final)

 

It seems that PTI has clear majority in the National Assembly.

 

Kpk is with PTI. More seats than last time. 

Sindh is with PPP again.

Punjab seems close though appears to be in favour of PML-n. (Though the situation with independents isn't clear). There is likely to be a lot of political maneuvering in the coming days.

Balochistan isn't clear. MMA and BNP close. Alliances will matter. 

 

Let's see how this goes.

H Rehman likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The current economic issues make me wonder if the Chinese are truly our friends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The current economic issues make me wonder if the Chinese are truly our friends.

 

The current economic issues make me wonder if the Chinese are truly our friends.

It’s not the Chinese’s job to run or manage pak economy. 

Pak needs $12bn immediately. The true repayment of cpec has not yet begun. Pak needs $12bn because it continues to run a huge budget deficit of  Approaching 5% of gdp.  Pmln in the last 3 years of its govt lost all financial discipline.

Also the balance of trade is appalling and the previous govts after Musharraf have totally failed to support exports or diversify away from traditional exports which to a large extent are linked to commodities prices.

 

Pti has some very good people in it and it’s manifesto reads well. Let’s hope they can bring the situation under control. The worst scenario will be that they manage the economy well and then lose the next election with the same old crooks and incompetents coming back in.

 

Aziz

 

Amar, IbnAbdullah, A Khan and 1 other like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Asalam u Alaikum Everyone,

Glad the forum is back! I am very optimistic of Pakistan's future but challenges remain. It will not be easy for Imran Khan to root out corruption that has become so entrenched and so many people dependent upon it to fill their pockets.  One thing I will say now is that the new government needs to ensure that any reforms they bring in today cannot be easily reversed. Wish IK came in with a 2/3 majority so the system could be truly changed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now